We’ve been watching the “Gun Control Gyrations” out of the Beltway, lately…
As “those who are your self-proclaimed betters” begin to pave new roads to citizen infringement, we’re wondering where all the weapons they’re trying to suppress will go.
Critics of bans on semi-automatic rifles are already arguing that once again, the government is showing its hypocrisy by essentially saying that AR-15s are good “personal defense” for the government, but not in the hands of law abiding American citizens.
When civilians own semi-automatic rifles, those rifles somehow become “assault weapons.”
You can argue that it IS reasonable for the Department of Homeland Security to request these rifles as they are indeed effective personal defense weapons.
The Department of Homeland Security is tasked with keeping Americans safe from those who wish to do the country harm, and its officials should be equipped with all the tools they need to do the job effectively.
But what about Americans who want to keep themselves and their families safe from threats?
Is a semi-automatic rifle unacceptable for a civilian’s “personal defense” in his or her home?
According to some Democratic lawmakers, politicians like Sen. Feinstein, it appears the answer is yes.
File this one under “HYPOCRISY”.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is seeking to purchase up to 7,000 “personal defense weapons” (PDW) — the same rifles called “assault weapons” when owned by civilians, The Blaze reported Saturday.
The initial request was posted last June, but just recently came to light, Jason Howerton wrote.
According to Steve McGough of RadioViceOnline.com, DHS said the “select-fire” weapons are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.” The weapons sought by the DHS would be capable of semi-automatic and automatic fire and would be equipped with high-capacity 30-round magazines, the same type some want to see banned for use by civilians.
New York state Sen. Greg Ball, a Republican, addressed the request in a press released earlier this week.
“Now the Department of Homeland Security even agrees that these modern sporting firearms, made illegal by Governor Cuomo, are suitable for self defense,” he said.
On Thursday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced a sweeping gun control bill that would limit magazine capacity to ten rounds and ban the same basic weapon sought by Homeland Security.
“Critics of such a ban on semi-automatic rifles are already arguing that the government is showing its hypocrisy by essentially saying they are good ‘personal defense’ for them, but not for American citizens. When civilians own semi-automatic rifles, they somehow become ‘assault weapons,’” Howerton wrote.
McGough also noted the hypocrisy in the government’s request.
“If it is appropriate for law enforcement, why is it not appropriate for civilian use?” he asked, noting that select fire/automatic weapons “are generally not used in situations where you need accuracy; like for home defense.”
Howerton says that while it’s reasonable for Homeland Security to be armed with the tools it needs to keep Americans safe, some, like Sen. Feinstein, apparently do not think average citizens should be allowed to protect their families with the same kind of “personal defense” weapons.
Last Tuesday, two New York students scared off armed intruders with an empty AR-15 rifle.
- Your CRIMINAL Gov’t: If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad, Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’?
- That’s Weird: DHS Wants 7,000 Scary Looking Rifles For Personal Defense
- DHS Wants to Buy 7,000 “Assault Weapons” for “PERSONAL DEFENSE”?
- Civil War: Big Sis to Purchase 7,000 ‘Assault Rifles’
- DHS to buy 7000 “personal defense weapons” (AR-15 for civies
- Obama Wants To Buy 7,000 Assault Rifles For Personal Defense
- Too Dangerous For Mere Peasants to Own: If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’?
- Homeland Security to purchase 7,000 assault weapons for personal defense
- Government Officials Can Still Own Assault Weapons Under Feinstein Bill
- DHS Latest To Highlight Flawed Logic Of Cuomo’s Gun Grab